The safe operation of boilers – who’s responsible?
Published: 08 September, 2016
Derry Carr*, chairman of the Combustion Engineering Association (CEA) takes a look at who is responsible for the safe operation of boilers.
If you are reading this, then the likelihood is you’re an engineer with responsibility of the boiler plant in your organisation. Now that could be a factory, a hospital, a chemical plant, a prison or in fact anywhere with a boiler. So, is the boiler plant your responsibility? Yes you say, it is my responsibility. The fact is, the over-riding responsibility for the safe operation of the boilers within your organisation sits with the head of your organisation. It may be the MD or the CEO or some other such title but for this exercise we will call him/her the MD. The chances are, they are not from an engineering background and possibly don’t even know where the boilerhouse is, but they cannot get away from it, in law, they are responsible. So what are their responsibilities? They must identify someone within the organisation who has the competence to manage the boiler plant and operate it in a safe manner. They’ve done that, I hear you say, that’s me. There is a bit more to it than just pointing at you in a meeting and saying, “as from tomorrow, you’re responsible for the boilers”.
Firstly, they must ensure there is a procedure in place that outlines how the company/organisation will manage and control the operation of the boiler plant. Secondly, before they say to you that you are ‘the responsible person’ for the boiler plant, they must ensure that you are competent to carry out that task. In law competence is very clearly defined:
• Education – this is obvious, you must be able to fully understand any training that you are given, you must be able to read manuals and interpret legislation and you must have a reasonable command of mathematics.
• Training – you must have had adequate training to carry out the task given you. A one or two day course in boilers with an attendance certificate at the end is not enough. You must attend a course that is assessed and you must prove to the assessor that you have understood the training and you will be safe when managing/operating the plant.
• Experience – this can be the tricky one. To gain experience you have to work on or mange the boiler plant. You can’t do this if you are not competent to do so. So the way to achieve this is by shadowing a competent person, until you are confident that you are ready to undergo the training and assessment.
Once you have carried out the training and assessment you will understand the complexities of managing and operating boiler plant. Not only do you need a good engineering background/understanding, you also need a good understanding of thermodynamics, after all that’s what boilers are all about, releasing heat from a fuel and transferring it into useful energy. You also need to know a fair amount of chemistry, it is a chemical reaction when fuels are burnt. The water chemistry within a boiler is critical to its safe and efficient operation. An understanding of metallurgy is also very useful.
When you’ve got to the stage of ‘the responsible person’ then you have to ensure you are operating the plant safely, legally and efficiently. The CEA publication BG01 is an important resource which is there to help you. If you follow the guidance then you will have complied with the law, and the operation will be safe.
The level of manning of your plant compared with the amount of automation on the boilers is critical in this. There are five levels of manning (detailed below) and I feel sure the number of personnel employed in your organisation is not a decision that you will have the authority to make. So again, that responsibility falls on the MD, if they want to decrease the level of manning, then they must increase the level of automation. If that is the case, they must ensure the funding is available to carry out the automation of the plant, but even with the highest levels of automation, you will still require fully trained and competent boiler operators. As there are still regular checks to be made, either on a daily basis or every 72 hours, as well as weekly checks, emergency response, start-ups and shutdowns etc. depending on the automation levels.
At this stage the MD may well say that they’ve had enough of this and contract out the operation and maintenance of the boilers to a third party, such as an energy management company. Unfortunately they cannot contract out their responsibility. They will still be responsible and they will still have to designate a person within the organisation to be the ‘responsible person’ for the boilers.
What happens if it does go wrong and you have an incident? Incidents with boilers are far more frequent than you would expect. Combustion explosions, furnace collapse, loss of water, uncontrolled release of steam (energy) all have to be reported to the HSE, even if there are no injuries. They are dangerous occurrences and as such need to be investigated. The outcome of such investigations are almost always the same, lack of training, poor maintenance, contractors competencies not checked, no clear lines of communication. All these are managerial problems and ends up with the most senior manager, the MD. The consequences in the very worst case could be ‘Causing Death by Gross Negligence’, which carries a custodial sentence. I have heard it said by MD’s that they didn’t know the law regarding boilers. That’s like telling a policeman you didn’t know the speed limit was 70 mph, it won’t wash with him and it won’t wash with the HSE.
It’s not all gloom and doom though. The best way to operate boilers is with a well-trained team. Get that right and the plant instantly becomes a safer place to be, it also becomes far more efficient. Trained staff see things starting to go wrong, such as a burner drifting from its optimum settings. Injecting too much chemical, which not only effects chemical cost but increases blowdown, which in turn wastes energy, as well as increased water and effluent costs. If you open your boiler and find scale, then you’ve got it wrong, find out why and address it. You should never find scale in the boiler, it costs money and can be very dangerous. All these issues can be eradicated if personnel know what they’re doing, which saves the company money and you an awful lot of grief.
As a postscript you might want to highlight this article and show it to the MD.
Five levels of manning
Fully manned
• A competent boiler operator must be in the boilerhouse all the time the boilers are operating
Local manning
• A competent boiler operator on site all the time the boilers are operating
• Must be within earshot of alarms and able to attend within 7 minutes
Unmanned (level 1)
• A competent boiler operator must attend the boilers on a daily basis
• A trained person must be able to attend an alarm in the absence of a competent boiler operator to ensure that the boiler/boilers have shut down safely and be able to summon a competent boiler operator if required
Unmanned (level 2)
• Automation on the boilers must follow guidance and be such that the boilers shut themselves down safely in the event of an alarm/incident
• A competent boiler operator must attend the boilers on a daily basis
• The boilers must be monitored from a remote monitoring centre all the time the boilers are operating and who has the ability to summon a competent boiler operator in the event of failure
Unmanned (level 3)
• Automation on the boilers must follow guidance and be such that the boilers shut themselves down safely in the event of an alarm/incident
• A competent boiler operator must attend the boilers at least every 72 hours
• Increased monitoring must be incorporated and monitored from a remote monitoring centre all the time the boilers are operating and who has the ability to summon a competent boiler operator in the event of failure
For further information please visit: www.cea.org.uk
*Derry has been involved with the operations and maintenace of boilers for over 48 years. He started his career as a Marine Engineer on high pressure, water tube boilers, serving mainly on aircraft carriers. On leaving the Navy he has worked predominately on shell boilers working for BP,
