Collaborative robots – risks and rewards

Published:  20 March, 2018

Jonny Grey, UK sales & marketing manager, Motoman YASKAWA, takes a look at collaborative robots and the risks and rewards associated with them.

When you are contemplating how to complete a challenging, tedious, dirty (or even dangerous) job there is usually a heightened sense of satisfaction when you actually get it completed. That sense of accomplishment on completing the job will occur the first time you do it and perhaps even after the first few times.

However, over time, these types of jobs are likely to become more tedious and subsequently could have a negative impact on operators and may also prevent them from spending time on higher value tasks in the manufacturing plant. This may come as a surprise given what we do for a living, but installing an industrial robot to take over tedious or monotonous work may not always be the answer. That’s because not all robots are equal.

Industrial robots can be a complex solution, especially for small and medium-sized businesses and not every plant manager has the staff (or the resources to hire an integrator) to program (and reprogram) a robot. Also, health & safety requirements will mean that the robots working area will need to be safeguarded to prevent potential injury to those working close by.

Depending on your application, you can overcome these challenges by hiring a special type of industrial robot; a collaborative robot, or cobot. A cobot is relatively lightweight and is designed to operate safely in close proximity to people. This can eliminate the need for safety curtains or fencing, thanks to the use of proximity sensors or force-limiting technology and with the proper application and risk assessment. It’s also easily programmed through hand guiding, which allows a worker to move the cobot’s arm to each point in a job instead of the more time-consuming process of typing commands into a pendant.

Those with only a limited knowledge of cobots may refer to them as ‘fenceless robots’ implying that they are safe. However, if you are manufacturing knives with a fenceless robot, is an operator working nearby any safer because the robot is moving slowly? It’s all about evaluating the complete system.

Before investing in a cobot, conduct an appropriate risk assessment. There are certified experts in robotics to handle these risk assessments to ensure that the robot, the application and operators interact safely. Getting this chemistry right brings the dual benefits of a safe place to work and improved productivity.

Here’s an example we saw during a site visit. A cobot grabbed a part for a lifting mechanism out of a forming machine; inspected it using a 2D camera and then inserted the part into another nearby machine for polishing. As a result of this repetitive task the operator previously manning this station risked injury from back strain and, toward the end of their shift, wasn’t examining the piece as closely as at the beginning of the day. The cobot eliminated the risk of injury to the worker who was performing this task and now ensures more consistent quality control.

Collaborative robots can work alongside humans and are easily configured. If a cobot comes in contact with an operator, it immediately stops to minimise or eliminate injury. If you decide to reconfigure your production line to handle a new product, a properly trained operator can re-program a cobot in an hour or two. Compare that to one or two days of lost production due to reprogramming an industrial robot to handle a production line changeover. For most plant managers, this alone makes a cobot a worthy investment.

In fact, collaborative robots are a way to future-proof a manufacturing process. If management wants to change the style or type of product its plants are producing, a collaborative robot is versatile enough to handle whatever changeovers are needed with minimal effort and time. Collaborative robots can also provide benefits in terms of safety, cost, quality and ROI; thus, making them a feasible solution for the technical and economic challenges faced by supply chain organisations, no matter the industry or size.

Sign up for the PWE newsletter

Latest issue

To view a digital copy of the latest issue of Plant & Works Engineering, click here.

View the past issue archive here.

To subscribe to the journal please click here.

Poll

"How is your manufacturing business preparing for a net Zero target?"






Twitter